Q: Peter, et al
No question, just a couple of thoughts. I'm not sure how "tireless" your resource people are, but it seems to me that on this forum you are getting so many questions on companies that you do not profess to follow that it must be taxing on those who are trying to give the best answer possible (and perhaps, more importantly, taking their time away actually doing reports on companies you want to cover). Have you thought of opening a monitered members chat room on your site? This might be: a) a lot of fun for all, and b) relieve some of the increased questioning which you are receiving. Also, re: the latter, simply saying "we haven't looked at this company and so cannot responsibly reply to your question" is a valid answer and one that, I would think, most would accept. (perhaps you already do this with off line responses). Anyway, thanks for all the great work.
No question, just a couple of thoughts. I'm not sure how "tireless" your resource people are, but it seems to me that on this forum you are getting so many questions on companies that you do not profess to follow that it must be taxing on those who are trying to give the best answer possible (and perhaps, more importantly, taking their time away actually doing reports on companies you want to cover). Have you thought of opening a monitered members chat room on your site? This might be: a) a lot of fun for all, and b) relieve some of the increased questioning which you are receiving. Also, re: the latter, simply saying "we haven't looked at this company and so cannot responsibly reply to your question" is a valid answer and one that, I would think, most would accept. (perhaps you already do this with off line responses). Anyway, thanks for all the great work.