Q: Hi 5I Research team, Trying to read PHM' annual report. Some question marks:
On page 6 : " Revenue for the 12 month period ended September 30, 2015 revenue totaled $71.7 million up $50.5 million from the same period in 2014. The increase in revenue for the year w as driven primarily by the acquisitions of Black Bear, Black Bear North, Black Bear NH, West Home Health, Sleep Management and Legacy Oxygen in 2015, and Care Medical in June of 2014. Combined these acquisitions generated approximately $47.2 million revenue in the year from their respective date of acquisition. In addition favorable exchange rates benefited revenue by approximately $4.1 million." : the numbers seem to indicate an organic growth negative? What am I missing?
Bad debt expense= 6 M$ (approx 8% of revenues): versus 5% of revenue the year before: can we expect this to be a recurring expense? Is this a sign of bad management or a necessary bad that comes with the business?
Impairment of goodwill and customer relationships = 10 M$ : Isn't worrying to decrease the valuation of very recent acquisitions (Legacy, West Home, 0891532BC-a related party transaction, RMG and RMC)? Does it mean they overpaid for these acquisitions, bad allocation of acquisition costs or the new management is cleaning-up the balance sheet when starting their reign?
Stock-based compensation = 9 M$: Is it a one-time expense for the work done during the last fiscal year or is it a recurring expense? Written differently: can we expect other expenses for the acquisitions made in that fiscal year or exclusively new ones for future acquisitions?
Can you explain why and to whom the options were issued over the last +2 fiscal years (nearly 47 M! > 10% of shares)? Is it a way to pay the management in place or is it to pay while making new acquisitions and keep new "acquired managers" motivated?
This company seems to have a good strategy. The current year will reveal if operations are in good hands. But, the price paid for some acquisitions, and its accounting generate question marks. Do you agree?
Thank you for your collaboration, Eric (sorry for the lenght)
On page 6 : " Revenue for the 12 month period ended September 30, 2015 revenue totaled $71.7 million up $50.5 million from the same period in 2014. The increase in revenue for the year w as driven primarily by the acquisitions of Black Bear, Black Bear North, Black Bear NH, West Home Health, Sleep Management and Legacy Oxygen in 2015, and Care Medical in June of 2014. Combined these acquisitions generated approximately $47.2 million revenue in the year from their respective date of acquisition. In addition favorable exchange rates benefited revenue by approximately $4.1 million." : the numbers seem to indicate an organic growth negative? What am I missing?
Bad debt expense= 6 M$ (approx 8% of revenues): versus 5% of revenue the year before: can we expect this to be a recurring expense? Is this a sign of bad management or a necessary bad that comes with the business?
Impairment of goodwill and customer relationships = 10 M$ : Isn't worrying to decrease the valuation of very recent acquisitions (Legacy, West Home, 0891532BC-a related party transaction, RMG and RMC)? Does it mean they overpaid for these acquisitions, bad allocation of acquisition costs or the new management is cleaning-up the balance sheet when starting their reign?
Stock-based compensation = 9 M$: Is it a one-time expense for the work done during the last fiscal year or is it a recurring expense? Written differently: can we expect other expenses for the acquisitions made in that fiscal year or exclusively new ones for future acquisitions?
Can you explain why and to whom the options were issued over the last +2 fiscal years (nearly 47 M! > 10% of shares)? Is it a way to pay the management in place or is it to pay while making new acquisitions and keep new "acquired managers" motivated?
This company seems to have a good strategy. The current year will reveal if operations are in good hands. But, the price paid for some acquisitions, and its accounting generate question marks. Do you agree?
Thank you for your collaboration, Eric (sorry for the lenght)