skip to content
  1. Home
  2. >
  3. Investment Q&A
You can view 3 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.

Investment Q&A

Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.

Q: Greetings,

I am currently reviewing holdings as i have taken over management of my own US 401K. I generally prefer to hold the individual stocks over paying management fees, however, as I research this fund, the fees seem to be worth it in this case and i certainly like the monthly dividend as i head into retirement in the next couple of years. Your thoughts on this one?

Thanks
Read Answer Asked by kelly on February 14, 2019
Q: Hello,question concerning the changes on the Income portfolio, H and CSH are been added to the portfolio jan.16,why we are not been notified on the change in real time, i've also noticed the change on the chart the Yearly dosen't give me the performance since Inception why the changes ?
Thank You
Daniel
Read Answer Asked by DANIEL on February 14, 2019
Q: Hi Peter and team, I'm just starting to look into setting up my RRIF and wanted to ask if 5i could recommend any good reading materials, with respect to what sort of assumptions I should make? Currently my portfolios are producing income which would equate to about the minimum I would consider withdrawing on an annual basis. This will be my only income other than CPP and OAS. Is there any benefit to equalizing my US/CAD exposures when I'm not really planning much travel to US? For example, I could replace my Telus with VZ or my RY with JPM. Thanks again for your great service.
Read Answer Asked by Keith on February 14, 2019
Q: Hello:

I am interested in your opinion on when to take profits. In this case I am looking at Absolute, but it could be another stock at another time.

I am up about 50%. That’s a tidy gain. The dividend is nice, but I can get that elsewhere. Removing tax considerations from this question, how would you make this decision?
Read Answer Asked by Dano on February 14, 2019
Q: I am not an accountant or financial guru but I have learnt a few things. One thing I thought I learnt was to value resource companies, particularly oil companies, on a cash flow per share basis instead of an income per share (P & E). I assumed that is due to the fact the product that is being produce is non-renewable. I am I right on this point? If so, then why do people who are supposedly financial gurus who appear on BNN continue to evaluate a resource company on a P/E basis. This happened last night with Ross Healy. Healy has been in the business for decades so he should know that P/E are not a good way to evaluate resource companies, yet that was the metric he used. He is not the only guest on BNN that has done this. On the other side are the Eric Nuttall types who appear on BNN and spew out cash flow numbers that sound amazing but when you dig a little deeper his numbers don't take into account sustaining capital that is required to offset declining production. Who cares if a oil company has $300 million of cash flow when they need to spend $300 million to offset declines. I use the word free cash flow meaning any cash that is left over after enough money is spent to keep production steady. Is this the right term? I know that guests' opinions on BNN should be taken with a large grain of salt but do you think these guests are trying to sway the viewers opinion to move a share price. Apparently foreigners ae not interested in Canadian resource stocks and most of the big Canadian money managers don't seem too keen on them either. So who is left to buy Canadian resource stocks? Us little retail investors. Can a comment on BNN's market call actually move the needle on smaller companies by influencing us little retail investors, in your opinion?(I guess there are three questions here.)
Read Answer Asked by Paul on February 14, 2019