skip to content
  1. Home
  2. >
  3. Investment Q&A
You can view 3 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.

Investment Q&A

Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.

Q: My daughter’s Investment acct and TFSA are reasonably balanced. TFSA holdings and returns are below. TFSA value is $88,247.

Stock Value Return Portfolio
Percentage
Bank of NS 11,228 5.83% 2.43%
Dollarama 9,741 -37.44% 2.11%
Element Capital 9,660 -9.56% 2.09%
Knight Therapau 12,304 -3.93% 2.67%
Parkland 14,136 119.37% 3.06%
Transcontinental 5,790 -39.08% 1.26%
Savaria 13,060 68.90% 2.83%
Spin Master 11,517 1.09% 2.50%

I’m thinking of splitting the 2019 $6000 contribution between TCL.A and SIS. Second choice is add a new stock such as CAE. Any thoughts? Many thanks.

Read Answer Asked by Robert on January 03, 2019
Q: I would like to add one railway holding to an already well-diversified portfolio .. given the recent news about CN's development of a bitumen "puck" as an alternative method for shipping crude, which of these two (CNR or CP) would you favour this month? Does this news have implications for pipelines?
Read Answer Asked by Patrik on January 03, 2019
Q: I am a new member to 5I Research.
Can you please review the beneficial tax implications of receiving dividends from Canadian companies vs companies outside of Canada?

With this in mind, what would be 10 top dividend paying Canadian companies you would recommend for a tax efficient retirement income?

Thanks and I look forward to your reply.
Read Answer Asked by Brent on January 03, 2019
Q: I currently hold small positions on the following. Based on current valuations and growth expectations, which Companies would you add to? in order of preference,

Thanks Valter
Read Answer Asked by Valter on January 03, 2019
Q: I have a few "balance" portfolio positions in my trade account that I am wondering about transferring to my TFSA. From 5iR answers, I take it growth is one factor to consider for possible positions for a TFSA and also a preference for less cyclical business companies.
MX is a dominant primary supplier but might be like a little cyclical what with seasonal demand by customers.
Then there is TFII that is growing through acquisitions but is tied to the general economy which is cyclical in nature.
Also, NFI has to business segments, buses and RV, and good backlog but is volume of business depends on municipal funding for transportation vehicles and then for RV, the "wealth" of folks...both segments have volume variability over time.
For growth, there is VB, although a smaller company relative to the other three.
With this, would you consider these good TFSA candidates? And if so, what order would you rank them, like first to last?........Thanks.....Tom
Read Answer Asked by Tom on January 03, 2019
Q: Do you have any dividend yield plays with this market correction,that a person could take advantage of? I prefer a yield with some growth,kind of looking at ENB,IPL,AQN. I currently have BNS,some preferred,debentures,etc. I would appreciate any suggestions you might have.
Read Answer Asked by Randy on January 03, 2019
Q: Two questions on Canadian equity/dividend ETFs:

1) The holdings in DGRC are selected based on market cap, expected earnings growth, return on equity, and return on assets. How is it that none of the Big 5 Canadian banks qualify for inclusion in their portfolio? This is puzzling to me. What is your opinion of this ETF for the core Canadian equity component of one's portfolio, for a longterm hold?

2) You continue to recommend XIC despite reminding members, many a time, of how the TSX index is heavily concentrated in financials and energy. Why? It is a cheap ETF, but other CDN equity ETFs (like DGRC) are modestly more expensive but I can't help but think that the few extra basis points in cost are worth it if it allows for a more balanced sector allocation overall. You continue to recommend CDZ even though it is very expensive, with a MER of 0.66. Why? I know it is analogous to VGG/VIG, which you (and I) love, but I don't think they're comparable, since VGG/VIG contains many companies with a much longer history of dividend increases (including many so-called 'Dividend Aristocrats' and 'Dividend Kings' whereas inclusion in CDZ only requires that a company has a history of increasing its dividend in at least four of the last five years. It almost seems like the continued recommendation of XIC and CDZ is due more to historical reasons rather than their merits as of right now, relative to other ETFs that may not have been available when XIC and CDZ were first made available.


Read Answer Asked by Walter on January 03, 2019
Looking for more? Sign up for a FREE 14 day trial! No credit card required

We invite you to sign up for a 14 day free trial of 5i Research!
Experience all the benefits and tools we have to offer; stock research, model portfolios, Q&A with our experts, and so much more. Join a community of like-minded investors today!