-
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB)
-
Premium Income Corporation Class A Shares (PIC.A)
-
Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK)
-
Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF (HCAL)
-
Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Financials ETF (HFIN)
-
Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK)
Q: Is there some way to score-board enhanced-yield Canadian bank ETFs/funds that assigns more weight to the factors that make more of a difference? Yes, fees add up, but even over the long term it's hard to see how basis-point fee differences could outweigh percentage-point yield differences. And won't either of these factors be outweighed by distribution tax treatment and, especially, by central bank rate-pivoting?
Further, in side-by-side comparisons, 5i often prefers larger ETFs (recently, for example, when comparing CBNK vs BANK.) But given large-cap banks' similar value-propositions and tendency toward mean-reversion, why should higher AUM matter (other than w/rt second-order effects like trading liquidity)? Put another way: what, if anything, could a new entrant to this sector do to make themselves attractive to 5i?
Please add to the supplied symbol list if other names provide more instructive comparisons.
Further, in side-by-side comparisons, 5i often prefers larger ETFs (recently, for example, when comparing CBNK vs BANK.) But given large-cap banks' similar value-propositions and tendency toward mean-reversion, why should higher AUM matter (other than w/rt second-order effects like trading liquidity)? Put another way: what, if anything, could a new entrant to this sector do to make themselves attractive to 5i?
Please add to the supplied symbol list if other names provide more instructive comparisons.