Investment Q&A

Q: I see CI MSCI Canada Quality Index Class ETF (FQC.TO) is no longer available. This was an ETF that seemed to following 5i's investments strategy. It's replacement CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) is very different, with a much different sector allocation.

Is there another Canadian ETF that you would recommend as a replacement for FQC, that is similar to the 5i strategy?

Thank you,
CR

Q: I am looking for a low fee Canadian equity fund or, preferably, ETF with good diversification. More specifically, less financial content than the TSX.
In 2017 you seemed to like MKC but there are no recent comments on it. What do you think of it today?
Are there better options I should look at?

Q: To establish a more passive approach for my Canadian holdings I am considering investment in the following ETFs. VCN 25% (core), MAW106 25% (core). MKC 30%, and HEW the remainder. Would you consider any changes to the above selections or allocations?

Thanks to a dedicated team
Merry Christmas to all.

Q: Gentlemen,
Can you please suggest 1 or 2 ETF with well Sectors balanced or equal sectors for each market Can, US, int'l, & emerging (in Ca$ and/or US$) ?
Thank You
Best regards.

Q: I just read Ryan's article about the effect of heavy weighting of some sectors in the TSX. Is there an equally weighted ETF version of the TSX available?

Q: I want to build a somewhat buy and hold portfolio that has a decent dividend. What are your thoughts on ZPW, ZWH, ZWC and what percentage would you give to each? Another possible portfolio would be MKC and MUS.
Your thoughts - thanks

Q: What is your opinion of the Mackenzie maximum diversification etf managed by Tobam, aside from the size of those etf which could be a shorterm issue.

Regards Alain

Q: A new investment strategy, based in Paris, has developed TOBAM (Think Out of the Box Active Management), which is a new anti-benchmark strategy of investing with a goal of minimizing volatility swings in the markets. Whereas the TSX has a 35.64% weighting in financials and a 20.58% weighting in Energy, TOBAM's strategy limits financials to 22.1% and energy to 9.1%. Consumer Staples, on the other hand, are weighted at only 4.16% on the TSX, while TOBAM gives that sector a weighing of 14.4%. While the strategy is fairly new, when you back-test data to 2001, it does seem to be working. Mackenzie Financial has a number of ETF's utilizing this strategy. I am interested in three of them... the Mackenzie Maximum Diversification Canada Index (MKC on the TSX), the Mackenzie Maximum Diversification U.S. Index (MUS on the TSX), and the Mackenzie Maximum Diversification Developed World ex North America Index (MXU on the TSX). All three are traded fairly thinly. The first two are currently at their highs, the last is currently at its low. Your insight please.