Q: I am currently reviewing my mother's non-equity portion of her retirement portfolio. She currently owns CLF, ZAG and short-term GICs. The interest from these investments are not needed for immediate living expenses. The non-equity investments in her portfolio serve to reduce volatility, and provide peace of mind.
Everything I have read recently indicates that interest rates have likely made a long-term bottom. As such, I am wondering whether my mother should sell ZAG and keep her interest-bearing investments in short-term, secure instruments only (i.e. CLF and GICs). In short, should she be staying away from mid-long term bonds?
Jeremy Siegel recently recommended that retirees should modify the traditional 60/40 stock/bond portfolio to 75/25 going forward because he does not anticipate good returns from longer-term bonds. Do you agree?
Many thanks for your thoughtful and valued insights.
Everything I have read recently indicates that interest rates have likely made a long-term bottom. As such, I am wondering whether my mother should sell ZAG and keep her interest-bearing investments in short-term, secure instruments only (i.e. CLF and GICs). In short, should she be staying away from mid-long term bonds?
Jeremy Siegel recently recommended that retirees should modify the traditional 60/40 stock/bond portfolio to 75/25 going forward because he does not anticipate good returns from longer-term bonds. Do you agree?
Many thanks for your thoughtful and valued insights.