Investment Q&A

Q: As a retired mainly income investor am I okay to keep holding these ETFs in the current market?

Q: Thinking about Martin’s question ( March 19) and your response, specifically on ROC. I own UMAX in a RRIF. I Look at its 14% yield as more than enough to cover the approximately 6% ( and rising) mandatory withdrawal, thus not negatively affecting my cash flow. I also see the ROC as lowering my unit price and thus the mandatory withdrawal amount. Is my thinking right on this ? Thanks. Derek.

Q: Hello, looking at UMAX, the price went from 16$ to 14$ in less than 2 years. Is it because the NAV is going down because of the dynamics of covered calls? Sould we expect a steady price erosion for the foreseeable future? It’s nice to have 13+% annual distribution but if we have a corresponding capital loss, I am not sure it makes sense. Can this ever be a long term hold? Thanks.

Q: I am an 80 year old income investor with some growth. I have $20,000 to employ. The above is a list of my losers out of 50 winners in a portfolio of mostly the Income Portfolio plus 15 yield maximizer ETF's like UMAX. Should I:
1. wait for your monthly advice before acting
2. distribute evenly accross the losers
3. add to the winners
Any other suggestions would be appreciated.
Please take as many credits as needed.
Thank you

Q: Thanks for your advice on greater than 10% covered call ETF's in a Trump tariff world .... Of the ones you { and the one I chose HPYT } I am leaning toward a combination of HBND and HPYT for bonds. UMAX for a non volatile stock ETF, and XYLD for US exposure .....

However I am not well versed on bonds . Could you explain the differences between the two ETF's ? I have noticed that they peaked in mid September and declined since. HPYT has declined by 10.65% and HBND by 12.66% ..... What market conditions account for the price action between September and now ? I have no idea what bond durations are or what the significance of a " long " bond is but I am curious why HBND has had the bigger decline of the two ? ..... If HPYT is the less volatile of the two I'm inclined to go for the juicier dividend ..... Please explain the differences between the two ETF's and what circumstances will effect one over the other ? ..... I'm inclined to make my bond ETF purchases now and my stock ETF purchases after the tariff announcements . Would you endorse this strategy ?

Also UMAX isn't really a utility ETF . It is Communication Services 23.2%, Pipelines 22.0%, Industrials 23.6%, and, Utilities 31.2% ..... Is this something I should consider ? Or do you still put it in a defensive category with a minimum of volatility potential ? ......{ I like the juicy 14% dividend but unsure how 5i evaluates it in a Trump tariff world } ..... Thanks for your terrific service ......

Q: Perhaps it is dumb question time, however I am struggling to understand the reported stats for UMAX. Perhaps it is an obvious answer I am missing.

As of Jan 21, 2025 the Hamilton ETF's web site says UMAX is yielding 14.67%. Just below that it shows "Total Returns (incl. Dividends)" of -4.53 for 1 month to 4.18% since inception. How is this possible without eroding the NAV (or a significant stock value loss, which I do not see based on stocks in the ETF). Scratching my head to see how this math works, as I was considering this ETF for yield in a LIF.

Thanks

Dave

Q: I have another question on these covered call style funds. If the underlying stock rises and the 'at the money' option is exercised and the stock is sold, do the funds have to rebuy equivalent stock?

Or is part of the risk profile that they may be paying out some of the increase in NAV as monthly dividends and the NAV will then decrease over time (or at least the # of shares will decrease).

Q: Love what you do.
Can you compare these two ETF's for income i'm setting up a portfolio for my wife

Q: Can you go over your thoughts (other than sector differences) between these 2 types of products. I know they both use covered calls to generate additional income and that one is a split share.

Would a product like umax typically keep its payments at some level more consistently (as there is no preferred share to protect)? Is the upside (downside) potential higher on the split?

That is what I am thinking are the main differences but wondering if there are any other differences in how you see them.

If one was lookig at a swap from FTN to umax to keep a similar yield and lower leverage risk is that a reasonable view?

Q: Please advise if HAMILTON covered call ETF (QMAX, EMAX and others) eligible for the Canadian dividend tax credit.

Thanks for the great service

Q: Does the 30-40% of the dividend being return of capital in this fund mean that NAV is always being eroded? I want to buy this for the long term but not if NAV is obviously always declining.

Q: With ETFs like these with high high returns but also high return on capital which contribute to these returns is it more beneficial to keep them in a taxable accounts or non taxable accounts like RRSP or TFSA ?
Thank you.

Q: With UMAX trading close to its 52 week low and yielding 13.8% would this be a logical time to buy and expect a likely increase in share price plus the current dividend $?

Thanks

Q: replace zwu with umax to increase income. does this increase risk? thx james

Q: Ing vs umax for sustainable dividend? Thanks

Q: I've asked quite a few questions on these new Hamilton ETF's and thank you for the explanations you have given me thus far . They have been very informative ..... I'll likely have a few more before I make my final decision on whether to purchase .... I have noticed that though 5i generally gives them a nod of approval you fail to recommend them in questions as a covered call option. For example in a question this morning from KIM looking to replace his 11% yield from EIT.UN you give ZWU as an option instead of UMAX which yields better than KIim's target yield. First question is why ? The fact that you are giving the nod to the BMO product is making me pause in my purchase of the Hamilton product .....
Second question is though UMAX has only been around since June 23 please give the both the return without dividends and the return including dividends for both UMAX and ZWU during the available time period ? Thanks for your terrific service .....

Q: Hamilton has the tax breakdown of their ETF's for 2023 posted on their website. I see both HMAX and UMAX distributions are 84% Return of Capital. This seems high. Do you think this is an aberration or potentially the norm? If an aberration, could you please quesstimate a percent range that you'd expect Return of Capital to usually be.

Q: Somewhat confused as to dividend. You state the dividend as approx. 13 % whereas TD Waterhouse says approx. 8 %.
What am I missing?
Thanks

Q: In my RRIF , I am looking at selling one of these stocks to buy UMAX for its higher yield and diversified holdings. Forgetting portfolio composition , please provide the order in which you would sell first (1) and then to last (5).
Thanks. Derek.

Q: Good evening,

I have a couple of questions regarding the following 5 ETF's. If it cost more than one credit that is ok. Just curious if you only own those 5 ETF's how diversified would you be? I understand that you be giving up some upside but from a diversification perspective do you have all your sectors covered?

For full disclosure I have 15 percent of my entire portfolio allocated to this 5 ETfs too add a little boost in income.

My last question regarding these 5 ETF's iss they all pay a distribution except SMAX and QMAX. SMAX and QMAX pay dividends according to my platform BMO investorline. Does that mean both these two are eligible for the dividend tax credit?

Thanks and have a great day.
Jimmy