Q: Hi Team,
In reference to discussion over MU earnings and the market not giving them any credit: I watched a clip yesterday I thought made a lot of sense in regards to the sector's historically "cyclical" nature. The guy was basically saying that with AI and the way the world has changed that the cyclicality of the chip sector is almost a "thing of the past" going forward. Demand brought on by AI is expected to essentially keep growing. More and more of everything we use and do now will be requiring chips. Right now the market seems like it does not believe the numbers that MU just put out will last more than a quarter. This just seems wrong. It makes sense to me that this guy may be correct in saying that we should not value these types of names as being so cyclical anymore. To me the way AI and technology is headed it looks almost like these names should be more viewed now as consumer staples, a necessity in today's life. Not sure what your thoughts all are on this? Would you agree?
Shane.
In reference to discussion over MU earnings and the market not giving them any credit: I watched a clip yesterday I thought made a lot of sense in regards to the sector's historically "cyclical" nature. The guy was basically saying that with AI and the way the world has changed that the cyclicality of the chip sector is almost a "thing of the past" going forward. Demand brought on by AI is expected to essentially keep growing. More and more of everything we use and do now will be requiring chips. Right now the market seems like it does not believe the numbers that MU just put out will last more than a quarter. This just seems wrong. It makes sense to me that this guy may be correct in saying that we should not value these types of names as being so cyclical anymore. To me the way AI and technology is headed it looks almost like these names should be more viewed now as consumer staples, a necessity in today's life. Not sure what your thoughts all are on this? Would you agree?
Shane.