Q: What do you think about NHC, is not it to late to initiate position at this point?
You can view 3 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.
Investment Q&A
Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.
Q: Keep in mind that I am now a retired (unabashed) income investor. My high risk growth days are past,(too much stress) Slow steady reliable 4% + div stocks ROCK MY WORLD NOW. So what is up (in your view) with the former Brookfield named (now Bridgemarg Real estate services)Is the recent poor performance a reflection of the name change and not having the star high profile parent name in it or a sagging sector. Is there something to fear about the div here. All my stocks average 3% holdings. Is this suitable or should I reduce? I have held it since 2012. Thanks for your time.
Q: What are your current thoughts about FCA.u and what do think about the conv deb offering?
Q: Trading slightly above offer.Hold or sell?
Q: I am looking to allocate 10 to 15 % of my retirement portfolio to the real estate market split between Canada and the USA. I would like to keep it to 4 ETF's . Suggestions please.
Q: What is the new payout ratio with dividend change
Q: Follow up on BRE.
In the answer to my question, the payout ratio is said to be ~75%.
Page 31 of the company’s Q1/19 report indicates the payout ratio has exceeded 100% for the last 5 years.
Is this an oversight, or is 5i calculating distributable cash differently than BRE management?
In the answer to my question, the payout ratio is said to be ~75%.
Page 31 of the company’s Q1/19 report indicates the payout ratio has exceeded 100% for the last 5 years.
Is this an oversight, or is 5i calculating distributable cash differently than BRE management?
Q: Hi 5i,
Just a comment in relation to Leon’s question about ROC. It seemed there was an aspect of it left unaddressed:
Q: With respect to ROC and reits. Should I as an investor with most assets in registered accounts avoid as a rule those reits with high ROC.
I assume ROC lowers the value of the company with each distribution . In a non registered account tax provisions allow one to offset the original coast by the same , this advantage is lost in a registered account.
Not being an accountant - am I missing something here?
While you covered that one holding a high-ROC REIT in a registered account gets no specific benefit from the ROC designation of the distributions, the fact is that for those people the ROC designation may simply be irrelevant. Specifically, it does not follow that high-ROC REITs should be avoided as registered account holdings; they may be well worth owning regardless of the account. The main point is just that if you have both a registered account and a non-registered/taxable account, a high-ROC REIT may be most advantageously held in the non-registered account.
The other suggestion, that ROC lowers the value of the company sounds like a misunderstanding (though it certainly lowers the cost base of one’s units). Money that companies or REITs pay out in any form (dividends, ROC, trust distributions, interest) may be taken to nominally lower the value of the company, relative to the alternatives of keeping that same cash on the balance sheet or reinvesting it in the company’s business. But again the ROC designation is completely irrelevant in this respect. Companies either have the capacity to pass along the potential tax advantage or they don’t. Of course any company that generates no value (operating cashflow or increasing asset value) but pays out a steady stream of cash must necessarily erode its value over time. This is true whether or not the cash paid out is designated as ROC for tax purposes. But many Canadian REITs are able to generate regular income from their properties and stream that income to their unit-holders without diminishing the value of their properties. The fact that some of them are able to designate some of that income as ROC for a period of time is not by itself an indication of any diminishment or problem with those REITs.
But two points that anyone considering the impact of ROC from their holdings should be aware of: 1. You don’t get to find out in advance how much of a given year’s distributions will be designated as ROC and 2. the proportion of distributions designated as ROC by a particular REIT can change significantly from year to year. So people should be somewhat careful with assuming that their future REIT distributions either will or will not be designated as ROC in some specific proportion. The reality that comes with the T-slips may be quite different.
Cheers!
Just a comment in relation to Leon’s question about ROC. It seemed there was an aspect of it left unaddressed:
Q: With respect to ROC and reits. Should I as an investor with most assets in registered accounts avoid as a rule those reits with high ROC.
I assume ROC lowers the value of the company with each distribution . In a non registered account tax provisions allow one to offset the original coast by the same , this advantage is lost in a registered account.
Not being an accountant - am I missing something here?
While you covered that one holding a high-ROC REIT in a registered account gets no specific benefit from the ROC designation of the distributions, the fact is that for those people the ROC designation may simply be irrelevant. Specifically, it does not follow that high-ROC REITs should be avoided as registered account holdings; they may be well worth owning regardless of the account. The main point is just that if you have both a registered account and a non-registered/taxable account, a high-ROC REIT may be most advantageously held in the non-registered account.
The other suggestion, that ROC lowers the value of the company sounds like a misunderstanding (though it certainly lowers the cost base of one’s units). Money that companies or REITs pay out in any form (dividends, ROC, trust distributions, interest) may be taken to nominally lower the value of the company, relative to the alternatives of keeping that same cash on the balance sheet or reinvesting it in the company’s business. But again the ROC designation is completely irrelevant in this respect. Companies either have the capacity to pass along the potential tax advantage or they don’t. Of course any company that generates no value (operating cashflow or increasing asset value) but pays out a steady stream of cash must necessarily erode its value over time. This is true whether or not the cash paid out is designated as ROC for tax purposes. But many Canadian REITs are able to generate regular income from their properties and stream that income to their unit-holders without diminishing the value of their properties. The fact that some of them are able to designate some of that income as ROC for a period of time is not by itself an indication of any diminishment or problem with those REITs.
But two points that anyone considering the impact of ROC from their holdings should be aware of: 1. You don’t get to find out in advance how much of a given year’s distributions will be designated as ROC and 2. the proportion of distributions designated as ROC by a particular REIT can change significantly from year to year. So people should be somewhat careful with assuming that their future REIT distributions either will or will not be designated as ROC in some specific proportion. The reality that comes with the T-slips may be quite different.
Cheers!
Q: Your comment on CARL re return of capital was that CAR>UN 42% BPY 0% ....and CSH 97%
I appreciate clarify the meaning of return of capital significance and of the 4 IIP and CSH was the highest and BPY the lowest ,so which is better.
Thank you
ebrahim
I appreciate clarify the meaning of return of capital significance and of the 4 IIP and CSH was the highest and BPY the lowest ,so which is better.
Thank you
ebrahim
Q: With respect to ROC and reits. Should I as an investor with most assets in registered accounts avoid as a rule those reits with high ROC.
I assume ROC lowers the value of the company with each distribution . In a non registered account tax provisions allow one to offset the original coast by the same , this advantage is lost in a registered account.
Not being an accountant - am I missing something here?
I assume ROC lowers the value of the company with each distribution . In a non registered account tax provisions allow one to offset the original coast by the same , this advantage is lost in a registered account.
Not being an accountant - am I missing something here?
Q: Twelve months ago BRE was a twenty dollar stock. Today it is 14 and change. What has changed in the company that would justify a 30% drop in the stock? Is the dividend secure, in your opinion?
- H&R Real Estate Investment Trust (HR.UN)
- Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CAR.UN)
- Chartwell Retirement Residences (CSH.UN)
- Brookfield Property Partners L.P. (BPY.UN)
- InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust (IIP.UN)
Q: I own these 4 REITS. Can you tell me what percentage of their distribution is return of capital, please
Carl
Carl
Q: Can you advise on what 5i would consider to be the most secure 8%dividend payer at this time? Thanks Larry
Q: Could you please tell me your best guess on how much FCR shares would be worth when it is converted to a trust. When do you expect this to happen,
Thanks
Thanks
Q: Do you think this REIT is undervalued?
What are your top choices in the REIT sector?
Thank you for your outstanding service.
What are your top choices in the REIT sector?
Thank you for your outstanding service.
Q: Opinion
Q: Peter; I’ve gone overweight on BEP.UN and am underweight BPY.Un- if I trim BEP.UN could adding to BPY.UN be reasonable? Thanks. Rod
Q: What are your current thoughts on EXE? Hold or sell?
Q: Hi 5i,
Does this company trade on any Canadian exchange?
Does this company trade on any Canadian exchange?
Q: Any info you can share on this trust? How does one invest in it if it is appropriate?