skip to content
  1. Home
  2. >
  3. Investment Q&A
You can view 3 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.

Investment Q&A

Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.

Q: Hello ... I purchased SGY a couple of years ago at much higher levels and am now thinking of averaging down. I consider Surge to be one of the better names in the small cap oil space (if that's possible) as I feel they have good assets, solid management, manageable debt and a sustainable dividend (provided energy prices don't take a tumble). I also think they are a potential take-over target. I'm looking at a 3+ year hold.
Comments please.
Read Answer Asked by Richard on January 22, 2019
Q: I see you sold WCP in favour of SU. I am down substantially on both VET & WCP. If I am moving the remnants of WCP to SU should I do the same with VET?
Read Answer Asked by David on January 22, 2019
Q: Thanks for your prompt answer on MEG. Given these circumstances what does the pricing dynamic look like? HSE failed to offer enough to persuade sufficient share holders to accept their offer, which implies a higher valuation should apply, so even if HSE foresaw issues which made it prudent to withdraw their offer, which should have been priced below their finally acceptable price, the current pricing should be well below that reasonably attributable to MEG, and what is the sentiment that might apply both to share holders that tendered and those that did not?
Read Answer Asked by Mike on January 22, 2019
Q: Your view on continuing to hold these stocks?
Read Answer Asked by Harold on January 22, 2019
Q: ..with Husky pulling the plug on MEG how would you rank these companies as possible targets, or are there any others you think are attractive. thanks.
Read Answer Asked by Curtis on January 18, 2019
Q: If I read the news correctly Husky took up from tendered shares 50% of those outstanding at their bid price some $3 above todays price, and subsequent turnover is over 60 million. Assuming Huskey was a competent offeror an that the tendered shares were paid for what is to stop them acquiring the majority of the balance at todays much reduced price in the open market and would that be a competent and allowed strategy?
Read Answer Asked by Mike on January 18, 2019
Looking for more? Sign up for a FREE 14 day trial! No credit card required

We invite you to sign up for a 14 day free trial of 5i Research!
Experience all the benefits and tools we have to offer; stock research, model portfolios, Q&A with our experts, and so much more. Join a community of like-minded investors today!