Q: Not sure how much you consider technicals before making purchases, but what do you make of the chart here? Seems to be breaking down. Would you wait a bit for a better deal? Or is that trying to be to cute for whats destined to be a long term hold.
You can view 3 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.
Investment Q&A
Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.
Q: Hi,
If you had a choice, which account would you hold KWH.UN in? Is it eligible for the Cdn tax dividend credit?
Thanks,
If you had a choice, which account would you hold KWH.UN in? Is it eligible for the Cdn tax dividend credit?
Thanks,
Q: Why the weakness in GSY? The only newS I See is they set the date (Aug,2) for the next earnings release.
Q: Hi all,
You recently had this Q and A reply:
Q: Could you please provide your opinion on your 2 best stock ideas for the near term {6-12 mths}. Thanks Valter
5i Research Answer:
Short terms are very hard to call.
We would suggest Methanex MX and Photon PHO.
My question is what catalyst you see for each stock that make them your favourite ideas for the next year?
You recently had this Q and A reply:
Q: Could you please provide your opinion on your 2 best stock ideas for the near term {6-12 mths}. Thanks Valter
5i Research Answer:
Short terms are very hard to call.
We would suggest Methanex MX and Photon PHO.
My question is what catalyst you see for each stock that make them your favourite ideas for the next year?
Q: If sector was not an issue, which would you choose to put money to work, GUD or PHO?
Q: Just a follow-up to the information I posted on Sunday: TDSI Action notes report yesterday, revised their target price from the $10 to $5.50 and calling the stock a HOLD. The analyst (only one) states that the 00740 and 00810 codes are being broken into 5 separate codes. "Although the changes include a mixture of rate cuts and increases, we believe the net effect could be an 8.5% reduction in CRH's realized rates."
"The underlying ASSUMPTION is that the proposed rules are implemented as is on January 1 2018".
He also believes the changes will hamper CRH's M&A activity.
Let's hope this analyst ( Lennox Gibbs) has decided to be ultra conservative after being comfortable on Friday.
Clarence
"The underlying ASSUMPTION is that the proposed rules are implemented as is on January 1 2018".
He also believes the changes will hamper CRH's M&A activity.
Let's hope this analyst ( Lennox Gibbs) has decided to be ultra conservative after being comfortable on Friday.
Clarence
Q: Hi 5i, what's the book value per share of CRH? Thanks very much.
Q: Hi 5i Team,
What would be your choice for an investment over the next 3-5 years between CAE and Magna?
Thank you as always,
Jon
What would be your choice for an investment over the next 3-5 years between CAE and Magna?
Thank you as always,
Jon
Q: What is your oversell level?
I feel there s money to be made in this name.
I feel there s money to be made in this name.
Q: I would have thought that the news release by the company would have stabalized the decline, but it has not. Any idea why the continued selling? Can you tell if the selling is retail or institution?
cheers
cheers
Q: When does SHOP and KXS report earnings, and what are the expected earnings for the quarter.
Thanks
Thanks
Q: I have a question about GUD. I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO BE PATIENT ON THIS NAME.iT SEEMS ALMOST TOO LONG .aNY SENSE OF HOW ONE CAN KEEP A PROPER PERSPECTIVE...WHEN ARE THEY GOING TO DO SOMETHING?
Q: Hi 5i,
Just a comment. For anyone looking at historical returns to evaluate the future prospects for a balanced (equity + fixed income) portfolio, it is extremely important to consider that the next 30 years of fixed income returns are virtually guaranteed to be significantly different than the past 30 to 40 years. Bond yields (interest returns) were in a generally declining trend, originally from nosebleed levels, for about 35 years from approximately 1980, during which even government bond yields dropped from double digit peaks to the negligible rates available over the past couple of years. The portfolios of investors who held bonds of significant duration early in that period reaped high interest rate bond returns while they watched the paper value of their bonds increase with each downward tick in interest rates. The fixed income component was potentially a tremendous contributor to very good portfolio returns over much of that extended period of declining interest rates.
Looking out over the next 30 years, the prospect is vastly different. Bonds don’t have anything remotely approaching the same kind of return potential. Current interest rate returns are still very low as rates are recently just beginning to move off what may later be viewed as ‘the bottom.’ The prospect for people who hold bonds of any significant duration while rates rise is that their holdings become less valuable. Low interest instruments may need to be held to maturity in order to avoid a loss of principal. In the meantime, those low interest bond returns will be a drag on any better portfolio returns that may be generated by equity holdings. If you have 50% of your portfolio in bonds that pay 2%, and you hope for an 8% overall portfolio return, you have to generate a return of 14% from your equities. Maybe bond yields will return to levels where they are not so detrimental to significant portfolio returns over the next 5 to 10 years but maybe they won’t. If they do, then holding bonds while the rates are rising can be painful. If they don’t, then they may go through an extended period where the chief value in bonds is the secure return of capital at maturity but the return prospects until maturity are relatively dismal.
The fact that someone buying a 10-year Canada Bond in 1982 got a 16% annual rate of return on it is not an indication of what anyone putting together a bond portfolio or balanced portfolio today can expect it to realize. It is completely irrelevant.
To assess the return prospects of a balanced portfolio today, you need to consider the relevant details and prospects for today's bonds, not the irrelevant details and portfolio contributions of bonds that have long since expired.
(Please print only if you think doing so may be helpful.)
Just a comment. For anyone looking at historical returns to evaluate the future prospects for a balanced (equity + fixed income) portfolio, it is extremely important to consider that the next 30 years of fixed income returns are virtually guaranteed to be significantly different than the past 30 to 40 years. Bond yields (interest returns) were in a generally declining trend, originally from nosebleed levels, for about 35 years from approximately 1980, during which even government bond yields dropped from double digit peaks to the negligible rates available over the past couple of years. The portfolios of investors who held bonds of significant duration early in that period reaped high interest rate bond returns while they watched the paper value of their bonds increase with each downward tick in interest rates. The fixed income component was potentially a tremendous contributor to very good portfolio returns over much of that extended period of declining interest rates.
Looking out over the next 30 years, the prospect is vastly different. Bonds don’t have anything remotely approaching the same kind of return potential. Current interest rate returns are still very low as rates are recently just beginning to move off what may later be viewed as ‘the bottom.’ The prospect for people who hold bonds of any significant duration while rates rise is that their holdings become less valuable. Low interest instruments may need to be held to maturity in order to avoid a loss of principal. In the meantime, those low interest bond returns will be a drag on any better portfolio returns that may be generated by equity holdings. If you have 50% of your portfolio in bonds that pay 2%, and you hope for an 8% overall portfolio return, you have to generate a return of 14% from your equities. Maybe bond yields will return to levels where they are not so detrimental to significant portfolio returns over the next 5 to 10 years but maybe they won’t. If they do, then holding bonds while the rates are rising can be painful. If they don’t, then they may go through an extended period where the chief value in bonds is the secure return of capital at maturity but the return prospects until maturity are relatively dismal.
The fact that someone buying a 10-year Canada Bond in 1982 got a 16% annual rate of return on it is not an indication of what anyone putting together a bond portfolio or balanced portfolio today can expect it to realize. It is completely irrelevant.
To assess the return prospects of a balanced portfolio today, you need to consider the relevant details and prospects for today's bonds, not the irrelevant details and portfolio contributions of bonds that have long since expired.
(Please print only if you think doing so may be helpful.)
Q: ITC since February has gone nothing but down. The chart looks terrible. PHO since April has gone nothing but down. It seems to remind me of CRH and CXR and we all know what happened there. Your opinion? Dennis
- Photon Control Inc. (PHO)
- Kinaxis Inc. (KXS)
- Savaria Corporation (SIS)
- Premier American Uranium Inc. (PUR)
- Spin Master Corp. Subordinate Voting Shares (TOY)
Q: Hi 5i Team:
What are 5 pure Canadian growth companies that you will recommend for TFSA. Risk is not a factor. No need for dividends. 3 to 5 year horizon. Plan to add future contributions to this list in the next few years. Of course I will be reading your reports to see if there are any sudden changes in these companies and adjust accordingly.
What are 5 pure Canadian growth companies that you will recommend for TFSA. Risk is not a factor. No need for dividends. 3 to 5 year horizon. Plan to add future contributions to this list in the next few years. Of course I will be reading your reports to see if there are any sudden changes in these companies and adjust accordingly.
Q: Hi Peter and Team,
Please share your thoughts on NFI's earring result. How is the outlook and valuation?
Thanks
Please share your thoughts on NFI's earring result. How is the outlook and valuation?
Thanks
- Sylogist Ltd. (SYZ)
- Photon Control Inc. (PHO)
- Celestica Inc. (CLS)
- Intrinsyc Technologies Corporation (ITC)
Q: My tech portfolio includes the above plus full positions of SHOP, KXS and CSU. I am looking at topping up one of the above. At current prices which would you choose and why? The aim of this portfolio is growth with moderate stabiliy.
Q: Is it possible that CRH sees competition to their roll up plan so they opt to buy controlling interest in a number of clinics to ensure a good market share and then over time pick up the NCI as the NCI partners sell out or move on. It would be nice to know what their game plan is. When did they make the switch from buying the complete business to just buying controlling interest?
Thank You
Clarence
Thank You
Clarence
Q: Lost 54% of CRH investments since starting 3 months ago. Do you suggest to claim my losses or stay in. Where do you think this is going?
Q: I bought ATD.B earlier this month in my TFSA and it was doing well so I added it to our joint account. But in the last few days it had dropped considerably and is now in the red. Any reason? Hold or sell? - Ted