Q: Very disappointed in your CGX trade in the Income Porfolio. You don't seem to follow your own advice when it comes to the income portfolio and recommend stocks that are in a downtrend/negative momentum simply to chase yield.
Aug 30-2017 you stated - Rationale: While the growth potential behind CGX is lower, now that the yield is in the 4.7% range, we view CGX as a good addition to an income portfolio. Cineplex offers size and stability along with an attractive dividend stream, making it a good fit for the income portfolio.
June 14-2018 you stated - Trade Rationale - Cineplex has been frustrating to say the least. On one hand, we do view that it has been unduly punished but on the other hand, management does not appear to really be helping the case. They have not done a whole lot to address the specific concerns against their core revenue base and while diversifying into the Rec Room business has potential, it is a slow roll-out and capital intensive. One could argue it is also akin to doubling down on the current business model.
Everything that you stated June 14,2018 also applied Aug 20, 2017, yet you still bought it seemingly for the yield.
The Balanced Portfolio seems to be where all the 5i focus and interest is, where the income portfolio is an afterthought. I assume most in the income portfolio are like myself, retired and living off dividend income. Yet you are recommending stocks simply for yield, even if the fundamentals and technicals are both negative.
Aug 30-2017 you stated - Rationale: While the growth potential behind CGX is lower, now that the yield is in the 4.7% range, we view CGX as a good addition to an income portfolio. Cineplex offers size and stability along with an attractive dividend stream, making it a good fit for the income portfolio.
June 14-2018 you stated - Trade Rationale - Cineplex has been frustrating to say the least. On one hand, we do view that it has been unduly punished but on the other hand, management does not appear to really be helping the case. They have not done a whole lot to address the specific concerns against their core revenue base and while diversifying into the Rec Room business has potential, it is a slow roll-out and capital intensive. One could argue it is also akin to doubling down on the current business model.
Everything that you stated June 14,2018 also applied Aug 20, 2017, yet you still bought it seemingly for the yield.
The Balanced Portfolio seems to be where all the 5i focus and interest is, where the income portfolio is an afterthought. I assume most in the income portfolio are like myself, retired and living off dividend income. Yet you are recommending stocks simply for yield, even if the fundamentals and technicals are both negative.