Investment Q&A

Q: Many of the analysts appearing on BNN seem cautionary about the market and suggest investors hold some cash in their portfolios.
In my opinion at the present time of the three 5I portfolios, the Finance portfolio is the most attractive and offers some very decent dividends. Your thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Bill

Q: Let's assume a recession is in the near future (so-called indicated by the inverted yield curve ..well maybe..)...which one of these two portfolios would fair better in your opinion and why. It's been awhile since we've been in one and I cant remember how these sectors acted back then .Not worried about concentration as either group would only make of a small portion of the overall equity/fixed income holdings..
#1 holds utilities ,industrials ,financials and energy stocks.
#2 holds consumer cyclicals , healthcare , tech , basic materials stocks.
Preservation of capital and income are main concerns.
thank as always..

Q: Inverted yield curve(US 3mo higher than 10yr interest rate).2 great views by Ryan on BNN on 3/29 & Peter in The Van Sun,3/30. My observations.1)As at 8pm pst 3/31 10yr is higher than 3m (2.439 vs 2.408) 2)A popular yield curve is 2yr & 10yr(2.294 is lower than 2.439).3)This will help the big 6 can banks as pointed out by 5I as they borrow short & lend long(better interest margins.Ryannyou were great on BNN Thanks for u usual great services & views

Q: My question relates to asset balance. I have recently retired and am in the process of de-risking my portfolio. That said, I'm also mindful of the dangers of investing too conservatively and outliving my investments. Given I am 60 with a good defined benefit pension, roughly what percentage of my portfolio would you suggest be skewed toward blue chip growth stocks (eg. GOOG, AMZN) vs. income stocks with limited growth potential (eg. AQN, PPL, FSZ)? Thank you.

Q: Hi gang, If my portfolio is set up 50/50 with 50% in equities and 25% in bonds and 25% in cash, and if I take the 25% cash and invest in a inverse mutual fund or short the index would my split go to 25/75? Looking at ways to ease the pain during the next bear which we can start to see in the rearview mirror, whether its this year or next. Just don't like giving money back.

Thanks
Anthony

Q: Hi, you mention that from when the yield curve first inverts, and when a recession begins, can be hard to time. Do you have dates, or a chart showing the correlation of these two. I'd like to be able to articulate this with more understanding. Thanks.

Q: Hi Guys
What is your opinion with respect to the possibility of a recession in the near term and how severe would the stock market impact be in your view. I have had money sitting on the sideline for months expecting the worst and other than December not much has happened. Your comments please.
Many thxs.

Q: Your comments please, on the following article in Reuters today with respect to a forthcoming recession once the yield curve inverts? Personally equities in general appear to be fully valued today and i'm reluctant to add cash to this market.

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The spread between three-month Treasury bills and 10-year note yields inverted on Friday for the first time since 2007 after U.S. manufacturing data missed estimates.

The three-month 10-year yield spread, the Federal Reserve’s preferred measure of the yield curve, narrowed to minus 0.56 basis points. An inverted yield curve is widely understood to be a leading indicator of recession.

The Market Purchasing Managers’ Index report, which tracks activity in the U.S. manufacturing sector, on Friday disappointed investors, with the headline index down 0.5 percent to 52.5 versus the expected 53.6. Earlier, Germany reported that domestic manufacturing contracted further in March, driving the benchmark 10-year U.S. government bond below zero and adding to fears of a global slowdown in growth.

The soft data exacerbated a trend that began on Wednesday after the Fed issued a statement showing policymakers foresaw no further rate hikes for 2019 given the slowdown in the American economy.

“The reality is the market is now expecting lower rates on average over the next 10 years than we have currently. And it’s a combination both of a dovish Fed and also ongoing global growth concerns,” said Jon Hill, U.S. rates strategist at BMO Capital Markets.

Q: I am close to retirement and have about 2/3 of my total portfolio in a corporate taxable account. All are equities with 53% Can, 39% US, 2.5% EM and 6% cash.
What could you suggest to recession proof and at the same time be tax friendly to help mitigate my risk given the aggressive 94 % equity holdings?
The other personal 1/3, of which 20% is in a non registered account, comprised of RRSP/LIRA/TFSA has about 33% fixed income.
Thanks
Jeff

Q: It seems to me that there are straws in the wind of a coming recession (inverting yield curve, global growth warnings, trade wars, Brexit hits, etc.). Would you agree with this hypothesis? What assets would you recommend for building a more recession proof portfolio? Should we leave stocks almost entirely and go to bonds? I have no real recession plan yet feel I need one. Any help is, as always, appreciated.

Q: Lots more discussion this weekend over an inverted yield curve. I have two questions:
1) Is this something to be worried of, and do you think investors should be more conservative in the next 12 months?
2) Didn't the 3 and 5 year yield curve invert in December 2018? If so, I'm assuming the 10 and the 2 inverting isn't a huge surprise, although markets have done really well in the past 3 months.

Q: Hi All at 5i! Now that it has been several years since the great market decline in 2008, who faired better overall?The US , that tried to spend its way out through quantative easing,or Europe , who decided on more austere measures? Thanks, Tamara

Q: Should we be concerned about market downturn regarding Brexit
Gail

Q: Could you recommend three recession proof sectors and three stocks in each of those sectors in both the US and Canada. Thanks

Q: I have heard anecdotally that the quants, computers, algorithms, etc. are responsible for a large portion of stock trades in today's market. Sometimes "experts" say that these automated systems exacerbate stock price moves to both the upside as well as the downside. Shorts sellers seem to have the power to punish stocks that get to ridiculously high valuations. But what tool does the market have to reward stocks that have been overly punished, other than time and the management taking the time to talk up their stock. An NCIB seems to be kind of an incremental way to support share price and I believe (correct me if I am wrong) that a company has to apply for an NCIB which takes time. Should stock exchanges give some new tools for companies to counter act a sharp downward share price movement? If a company has a strong balance sheet, let's say net cash positive, perhaps they should have the option to buy back large amounts of stock on short notice when the quants, computers, automated trading etc. drive prices far lower than they should go. In this scenario companies that are prudent financially could take of advantage of a Dec 24,2019 incident. In these situations a company could say to the market," If that is how little you think of our shares we will gladly buy as much of it back and send them to treasury, thank you computer traders, thank you computer trading, thank you ." I am not in the financial industry so I may not understand the big picture. This is kind of a long and complicated question so I am not sure if you can answer it without writing an essay.!!

Q: I don't think the most important reasons to hold bonds in a portfolio have been touched on yet, so here's my take. Dave, of the March 5 question to 5i on bonds, is probably a guy of working age. I, as a retired person, have a different perspective on holding bonds other than enhancing a portfolio's returns, but this is occasionally possible in a low to negative market return year if fully invested in stocks.

I am quite content to receive a 50% bonus to the inflation rate on my fixed
income part as it means I am holding my own after tax when it comes to the
spending power with inflation on that part of the portfolio and it is indeed
about asset allocation as I try to cover all asset classes in my portfolio
strategy including stocks, prefs, gold, cash and fixed income. (No crypto yet). For me, stocks provide the main boost in the overall return, long term. The dividend tax credit's a big help.

What I like about buying individual bonds which I usually hold to maturity is
controlling the issuer's credit quality (for me always investment grade), the
maturity date, and the guaranteed capital gain if buying discount. I've tried
bond ETFs for trading and better liquidity but since I have no control on
maturity or quality, I always seem to end up claiming a loss on the sale, and
any return is fully taxed as interest. I'll buy GICs also for a better interest
rate. The 3 reasons 5i gave for not liking bonds are, for me, minor reasons for having bonds, at my stage of life, if properly balanced in the portfolio.

As far as investment gurus like Buffet being fully invested in equities, this isn't quite accurate.The core of his Berkshire portfolio is insurance stocks which in and of themselves can be considered pension or bond-like. When they receive premium income, what do they buy - bonds because they need to be certain of future obligations and be liquid at the same time. Let's not forget the bond market is 40 times the size of the stock market, which is why Buffet laments there's nothing of size for him to buy and he ends up with holdings like Kraft Heinz. I'll wager the bond holders at KHC are sitting pretty while the stockholders cry in their soup.

If you've read this far, you're probably wondering how deep I'm into bonds and bond equivalents:
It's 29% compared to 14% cash 11% prefs 42% stocks & 4% gold currently, but this does change.

Q: Hi 5i team,
You recently answered a question (from Angus, feb 6th) about a list of large Canadian (TRI, CSU, ATD.B, SHOP, ONEX and BYD.UN and usa) companies that could be long term holds based on their management (past and current accomplishments). My question is: what would be a generic maximum weighting for such companies (one weighting for every one of them) if portfolio is invested for a very long period (no need to withdraw money)? Or another way to ask the question: how many different companies would be needed?
Thank you for your collaboration,
Eric

Q: Hi there, it seems like more and more commentary is stating we are in late cycle. Assuming this means that we will soon see a recession in the next 12-18 months, would it make sense to hide out in a low volatility ETF for the time being? It seemed to have held up pretty well in the 2018 Q4 drop. What are your thoughts regarding this strategy and between ZLU and ZLB which would be preferred to be in, or would you split your portfolio 50/50 for diversity? Thanks!

Q: Hi Gang, good news is I sold most of the above with gains except for COV and KXS, looking closer if I did not the losses would put me in big trouble, over 40% for most of them from the high, I know that 2018 was not a stellar year but I'm 65 years old and can't wait 5 years for these stocks to come back, do you have any thoughts on how to get out before a stock takes a 40% haircut, is a 8% or 10% stop rule help or perhaps farther out. Thanks Anthony

Q: For the last eight years my portfolio has been almost exclusively US large capilization stocks. My rate of return has been great, significantly above the averages. I do not intend to change my portfolio away from the US markets for the foreseeable future. Am I making a mistake?
Clayton