Q: I run 2 balanced portfolios, one for my wife and one for myself. Both are in our TFSAs and each portfolio contain 24 stocks. My question is would it be more advantageous to have the same stocks in each portfolio or different stocks in each to have more diversification. Can being too diversified work against you in certain cases. Thank you very much for your much appreciated advice.
You can view 3 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.
Investment Q&A
Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.
Q: This is something that has been rattling around in my noggin for some time. In a LIF account for a 72 year young senior, the weighting for CSU is currently 8.10%, and from time to time, nearly reaches 10% but for the overall portfolio is now 3.93%.(The overall portfolio includes trading accounts, TFSA and one LIF account for a family of four person, 2 seniors and 2 yougner ones.) The question is this - should I reduce the weighting of CSU, say. in the LIF account as it is approaching 10% and then add the trimmed amount to another account, like trade or TFSA?.....This is more about the approach or principle of things rather than about specifically CSU........Thanks for the assistance on this matter/issue.......Tom
Q: Hello 5i Team
Imperial Oil (IMO) completed its Significant Issuer Bid (SIB) on June 15.
IMO then announced a new Normal Course Issuer Bid (NCIB) commencing approximately June 29.
In the 2nd quarter financial report, IMO has stated the NCIB will be completed by the end of October, based on purchasing the maximum allowable shares per day as per the NCIB.
Question, if IMO completes the NCIB on November 04 based on the maximum daily share purchases can IMO commence a second SIB in the one year period following the completion of SIB completed on June 15 (i.e. commencing early November or December 2022).
If IMO cannot undertake a second SIB, would they be limited to either increased dividends or a special dividend or are there other options to distribute excess capital back to the shareholders.
Is there a readily available website source for SIB, as recently other companies have announced SIB (E-L Financial, United Corporations, Economic Investment Trust)? Maybe as they are announced they can be included on your dividend announcement page?
Thank you
Imperial Oil (IMO) completed its Significant Issuer Bid (SIB) on June 15.
IMO then announced a new Normal Course Issuer Bid (NCIB) commencing approximately June 29.
In the 2nd quarter financial report, IMO has stated the NCIB will be completed by the end of October, based on purchasing the maximum allowable shares per day as per the NCIB.
Question, if IMO completes the NCIB on November 04 based on the maximum daily share purchases can IMO commence a second SIB in the one year period following the completion of SIB completed on June 15 (i.e. commencing early November or December 2022).
If IMO cannot undertake a second SIB, would they be limited to either increased dividends or a special dividend or are there other options to distribute excess capital back to the shareholders.
Is there a readily available website source for SIB, as recently other companies have announced SIB (E-L Financial, United Corporations, Economic Investment Trust)? Maybe as they are announced they can be included on your dividend announcement page?
Thank you
Q: Let me echo the earlier comment about the valuable insights from your Canadian Quarterly Earnings Pulse Report.......Wow, like an "executive summary" that puts plenty into perspective........Many thanks and looking forward to "digesting" future Pulse Reports, too!!!........Tom
Q: I just read your new Canadian Quarterly Earnings Pulse Report; great report and very pertinent! Thanks.
Q: I have a single share of BAMR from the spinoff. Am I able to have a BAMR share journaled (if that's the correct term) to a BAM.a share?
Thanks
Thanks
Q: Hi
What is 5i's take on your first Sentiment Survey - anything surprise you particularly?
Thanks
What is 5i's take on your first Sentiment Survey - anything surprise you particularly?
Thanks
Q: Hi, you mention short interest from time to time. Using MTTR as an example, you say that short interest is very high at 15%. I assume this is a negative as there are a lot of shorts (or shares short) that want to drive the price down. However, some view this as a positive as any good news can force all the shorts to cover. There are also different views on days to cover. MTTR shows 6 days. Some view higher numbers, such as 10, as positive as it means there could be a sustained rally if the shorts have to spread out their buying over a longer period rather than a quick spike.
What short interest levels and number of days to cover do you view as being positive or negative influences on a stock price?
Thanks
What short interest levels and number of days to cover do you view as being positive or negative influences on a stock price?
Thanks
Q: I have ~$10,000 in ATS Automation. Do you think I’m better off to apply that money to a LOC charging a floating interest rate currently around 7%?
In general would I be better off doing this with all my un-registered stock holdings?
In general would I be better off doing this with all my un-registered stock holdings?
Q: Dear 5i
I believe its probably a good time to start buying back into the market slowly over the next couple months but i`m concerned that i`ll buy quite a bit only to see values go down once a recession hits . I know there`s no guarantee of a recession but it does look very likely that we will have one to at least some degree . With the recession possibility in mind do you still think buying selective stocks and ETF`s over the next two or so months is a wise strategy ?
Thanks
Bill C
I believe its probably a good time to start buying back into the market slowly over the next couple months but i`m concerned that i`ll buy quite a bit only to see values go down once a recession hits . I know there`s no guarantee of a recession but it does look very likely that we will have one to at least some degree . With the recession possibility in mind do you still think buying selective stocks and ETF`s over the next two or so months is a wise strategy ?
Thanks
Bill C
Q: I have a sizeable RRSP holding with many Canadian and US companies. Soon I’ll start trading out of the money covered calls to enhance the portfolio yield. I understand how covered calls work but when I actually start trading them my knowledge will grow considerably and don’t want to make rookie mistakes. I’m thinking of starting with telecom, utilities, and banks as they have big share counts and option interest. Does this make sense, also what do you look for when trading covered calls? Specific sectors, large stable companies?
Thanks for your help!
Thanks for your help!
Q: I have had the impression that covered calls were a riskier type of investment but when I look at the beta, std dev, alpha, sharpe ratio, etc I don't see much difference between the two ETFs listed. Are they both considered about equal?
Q: When doing my do diligence and research on a stock there are of course many fundamentals and ratios to consider---I count 11 on my spread sheet--I think they are all important but can you boil that down to maybe the 3 most important.
Q: What's your view on using protective puts and covered calls?
Q: Hi guys
I read something recent from Vitaliy Katsenelson (love his writing) which really hit home..... his thought that buying a stock is an "act of arrogance." I have copied part of it below. Please make it Public if you think his thoughts have value. You often remind us, like Mr. Katsenelson, that there is always someone else on the other side of a trade - with opposite thoughts on an equity.
Thoughtful Arrogance
Volatility can be both a feature and a bug of investing. Value investors attempt to treat it as a feature. We try to take advantage of the exuberance of the upswing and the pessimism of the downswing. I use the words attempt and try because though this approach sounds great in theory, reality proves to be a lot more challenging. This gap between theory and practice is created because volatility doesn’t waltz in a vacuum.
Upswings are accompanied by optimism and a positive news , or at least the positive spin the crowd puts on the news – this pushes a stock up. Downswings don’t happen in a vacuum, either; they are accompanied and usually driven by negative news, which results in Mr. Market marking down the value of your initial investment. Fear sets in. What if Mr. Market is right? What if this new news and the army of commentators on CNBC are right?
As the great American philosopher Mike Tyson said, “Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.” Theory gives you the game plan (buy more when the stock is down), but then the market punches you in the mouth.
Our ultimate goal is to narrow the gap between theory and practice and take advantage of volatility. We do this through thoughtful arrogance.
Let me explain.
Investing is an act of arrogance. You are basically saying, “I am right and the person on the other side of the transaction, who is buying a stock from me or selling it to me, is wrong.” Value investing takes that arrogance to an even greater extreme, as you are often buying unloved, if not hated, stocks.
However, arrogance comes in different forms. Plain vanilla arrogance is very dangerous in investing. Softbank CEO Masayoshi Son built Softbank out of nothing. He is one of the richest people in Japan, he is a visionary, and he has had one of the best multidecade investment track records.
However, today his Vision Funds are at the tip of the spear of dotcom 2.0 as it shatters against the rock-hard wall of economic reality, losing his investors tens of billions of dollars this year. Mr. Son is solely responsible for it. He recently admitted, “When we were turning out big profits, I become somewhat delirious.” Success went to his head. He started thinking that he had the Midas touch. This is why temperament is so important in investing: We are our own biggest enemy.
And then there is thoughtful arrogance.
This arrogance requires amnesia of your past successes and failures; it is earned with your current sweat, through thorough research. Your research leads you to conclusions that often disagree but sometimes agree with the prevailing trends in the market. Arrogance – belief in your process and research – allows you to follow through on your conclusions, even if the market scorns them.
Stuart
I read something recent from Vitaliy Katsenelson (love his writing) which really hit home..... his thought that buying a stock is an "act of arrogance." I have copied part of it below. Please make it Public if you think his thoughts have value. You often remind us, like Mr. Katsenelson, that there is always someone else on the other side of a trade - with opposite thoughts on an equity.
Thoughtful Arrogance
Volatility can be both a feature and a bug of investing. Value investors attempt to treat it as a feature. We try to take advantage of the exuberance of the upswing and the pessimism of the downswing. I use the words attempt and try because though this approach sounds great in theory, reality proves to be a lot more challenging. This gap between theory and practice is created because volatility doesn’t waltz in a vacuum.
Upswings are accompanied by optimism and a positive news , or at least the positive spin the crowd puts on the news – this pushes a stock up. Downswings don’t happen in a vacuum, either; they are accompanied and usually driven by negative news, which results in Mr. Market marking down the value of your initial investment. Fear sets in. What if Mr. Market is right? What if this new news and the army of commentators on CNBC are right?
As the great American philosopher Mike Tyson said, “Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.” Theory gives you the game plan (buy more when the stock is down), but then the market punches you in the mouth.
Our ultimate goal is to narrow the gap between theory and practice and take advantage of volatility. We do this through thoughtful arrogance.
Let me explain.
Investing is an act of arrogance. You are basically saying, “I am right and the person on the other side of the transaction, who is buying a stock from me or selling it to me, is wrong.” Value investing takes that arrogance to an even greater extreme, as you are often buying unloved, if not hated, stocks.
However, arrogance comes in different forms. Plain vanilla arrogance is very dangerous in investing. Softbank CEO Masayoshi Son built Softbank out of nothing. He is one of the richest people in Japan, he is a visionary, and he has had one of the best multidecade investment track records.
However, today his Vision Funds are at the tip of the spear of dotcom 2.0 as it shatters against the rock-hard wall of economic reality, losing his investors tens of billions of dollars this year. Mr. Son is solely responsible for it. He recently admitted, “When we were turning out big profits, I become somewhat delirious.” Success went to his head. He started thinking that he had the Midas touch. This is why temperament is so important in investing: We are our own biggest enemy.
And then there is thoughtful arrogance.
This arrogance requires amnesia of your past successes and failures; it is earned with your current sweat, through thorough research. Your research leads you to conclusions that often disagree but sometimes agree with the prevailing trends in the market. Arrogance – belief in your process and research – allows you to follow through on your conclusions, even if the market scorns them.
Stuart
Q: Hi Peter
Not a question, but a comment
In Market call today, a caller from
Vancouver requested to invite you. Andrew Bell made a note. The analyst of the day, Jamie Murray, acknowledged and mentioned you as really good
Hoping you will get a call soon
Not a question, but a comment
In Market call today, a caller from
Vancouver requested to invite you. Andrew Bell made a note. The analyst of the day, Jamie Murray, acknowledged and mentioned you as really good
Hoping you will get a call soon
Q: Good morning 5i
Your portfolio tracker tells me that i have too many funds. I hold stocks as well as the funds. Some, like iwc and iwo are in smaller proportions. I guess I became a bit too enthusiastic and i am wondering whether you could make some suggestion as to how best to rationalize these. They are: RSP
VOO
IWO
IWC
ICLN
VEA
VWO
VYMI
thanks for your excellent service
Your portfolio tracker tells me that i have too many funds. I hold stocks as well as the funds. Some, like iwc and iwo are in smaller proportions. I guess I became a bit too enthusiastic and i am wondering whether you could make some suggestion as to how best to rationalize these. They are: RSP
VOO
IWO
IWC
ICLN
VEA
VWO
VYMI
thanks for your excellent service
Q: i would like to have your opinion about buying shares like Amazon or Goog on the Neo exchange.
Thank you very much for your good work Lorraine
Thank you very much for your good work Lorraine
Q: This is not a question, but an experience I'd like to share.
I have subscribed to Peter's covered call selling for many years. For instance I had a September expiry $30 CC on CCXI that gave me a $1.50 credit. So, the stock was selling at 24 and the CC strike was 30 and the credit for selling the call was 1.5. So potentially I could make a max profit of 7.50. Not bad I thought.
Then I woke up this am and was confronted with this:
https://www.tipranks.com/news/press-releases/amgen-to-acquire-chemocentryx-for-4-billion-in-cash
Be prepared for that eventuality if you use the CC strategy. Even though it happens much less frequently then desired it does hurt the greed part of our ego. No doubt about that.
Sheldon
I have subscribed to Peter's covered call selling for many years. For instance I had a September expiry $30 CC on CCXI that gave me a $1.50 credit. So, the stock was selling at 24 and the CC strike was 30 and the credit for selling the call was 1.5. So potentially I could make a max profit of 7.50. Not bad I thought.
Then I woke up this am and was confronted with this:
https://www.tipranks.com/news/press-releases/amgen-to-acquire-chemocentryx-for-4-billion-in-cash
Be prepared for that eventuality if you use the CC strategy. Even though it happens much less frequently then desired it does hurt the greed part of our ego. No doubt about that.
Sheldon
Q: Dear 5i crystal ball.
Re recent comments on a market rallying just before and/or after announcement of a recession. The merits of which said recession seem to be debatable, but the market rally is in plain sight. Much of what I'm reading suggests that with increasing rates, the economy will slow, as intended, inflation will succumb, and a real recession will occur sometime in the next 12 months, accompanied by a market downturn. Accepting that the market is forward looking is the market currently looking beyond the real recession yet to occur, and therefore the current rally is sustainable, or are we to expect another market dowturn in the near future?
Thanks.
Peter.
Re recent comments on a market rallying just before and/or after announcement of a recession. The merits of which said recession seem to be debatable, but the market rally is in plain sight. Much of what I'm reading suggests that with increasing rates, the economy will slow, as intended, inflation will succumb, and a real recession will occur sometime in the next 12 months, accompanied by a market downturn. Accepting that the market is forward looking is the market currently looking beyond the real recession yet to occur, and therefore the current rally is sustainable, or are we to expect another market dowturn in the near future?
Thanks.
Peter.