Q: My question is not about Wajax specifically, but using Wajax as an illustration in the context of my question.
In previous answers, you have repeatedly expressed a leaning towards shedding losing stocks and replacing them with others currently showing promise, on the premise that there's an opportunity cost involved in holding the "loser".
Assuming the company (Wajax in this case, on which I'm down almost 50%) is a well-managed company, and in the absence of known problems, and the company is merely being battered by economic conditions WHICH WILL (EVENTUALLY) TURN AROUND, wouldn't any replacement stock have to double in value (including reinvested dividends) before reaching breakeven? And isn't it likely that the loser stock, Wajax in this case, will likely double in value sooner than (almost) any replacement stock (provided the replacement isn't of substantially higher risk profile)?
Or, to put it a different way, isn't the opportunity cost of continuing to hold the losing stock effectively nil?
Thanks for your and your team's continuing effeorts to educate us! Lotar.
In previous answers, you have repeatedly expressed a leaning towards shedding losing stocks and replacing them with others currently showing promise, on the premise that there's an opportunity cost involved in holding the "loser".
Assuming the company (Wajax in this case, on which I'm down almost 50%) is a well-managed company, and in the absence of known problems, and the company is merely being battered by economic conditions WHICH WILL (EVENTUALLY) TURN AROUND, wouldn't any replacement stock have to double in value (including reinvested dividends) before reaching breakeven? And isn't it likely that the loser stock, Wajax in this case, will likely double in value sooner than (almost) any replacement stock (provided the replacement isn't of substantially higher risk profile)?
Or, to put it a different way, isn't the opportunity cost of continuing to hold the losing stock effectively nil?
Thanks for your and your team's continuing effeorts to educate us! Lotar.