Q: Hello,
I own ATA and AIF in my RRIF account, both of them suffering a small loss. I would like to replace one or both of them with ECN. What is your thought? I usually like to hold stocks for at least 3 years. Thank you very much.
Herbert
Q: Hi,
I already own some MA but I want to add more exposure to this sector. Which of these companies would you suggest for a long term hold with minimal volatility? (I'm not sure why why my TD webroker trading platform lumps CRM into the same category as the others but it does?)
Is there a credit card ETF you like?
Also, are there any equivalent Canadian stocks?
Q: My thoughts, further to Dale's inquiry on March 12. I also received notice of PWF's plan for a buyback of 8% of their total shares. I won't be tendering my shares for a few reasons. I like the 5% dividend. Back in May 2018 they announced a 6% div. increase, and there may be another announcement coming this spring. Also, PWF will only advise the actual share price given for this tender, after the deadline to tender has passed. The range given is anywhere from $29 to $34.
I will stay on the sidelines. A sound decision?
Q: I have owned JPM, TD and BNS for a few years. The thinking was it would enable me to spread my investments outside of Canada. Given the lacklustre performance of JPM and the fact that TD has significant US assets and BNS is international, I am thinking of swapping JPM for VISA (or MC if you think that is better) to get financial assets that may act just a bit differently than the banks. Does this thesis make sense?
Q: Although securities are " held in segregation ", what specifically ensures that beneficial shareholders (non-registered ) are protected from a legal( registered) holder's liquidity issue ? My question relates to the possibility, not the probability of a liquidity issue . The question relates to large portfolios which are well beyond the scope of the CIPF protection . As an aside , I would note that , contrary to conventional wisdom , Canadian banks , although much stronger than many others around the world, are not really " well capitalized " . They meet and exceed very weak regulatory standards and regularly pass related stress tests . Over leveraging produces very good returns on too little capital . An informed analysis of all of our major banks balance sheets should raise the issue of possible risk associated with weak regulatory standards regarding capitalization .
Q: Good Morning,
Can you please provide analysis on both companies. What is your outlook on both. CIBC analyst this morning said GWO is a buy vs. SLF (sell). Would you sell SLF and buy GWO? I would greatly appreciate your view.
Q: I have been called by ECN's Proxy Agent to solicit my votes for the matters before their upcoming AGM. Are you aware of any significant issues concerning executive compensation or the share plans Thank you
Q: Hi Team,
Any concerns about the recent headlines that Toronto-based Brookfield faces scrutiny from Democrats (in the US) over its deal with Kushner company for 666 5th Ave. in New York. It involves (minimally, reportedly) the Qatari investment fund.
Thanks very much, Michael
Q: Any conclusions to be taken from the share buyback announcements from GWO (as part of a broader program within the Power group)? Seemingly significant, they.
Thanks,
Randy
Q: I received a press release from pwf re intention to repurchase up to 1.65billiuon of its common shares thru a substantial issuer bid GW life do u have any suggestions on this press release Mar 4/19 I have a fair '"' of shares over 1000 douj have any comments on this offer?
Q: Could I please have your opinion on AEG. Some assessment in regard to future prospects, dividend sustainability, and how much it’s presence within a struggling European market accounts for its share price would be appreciated.
Thanks, Don