Q: hi folks:
what am i missing here?
time and again, when a dividend company comes under pressure (in this case AQN) all the wags talk about 'soaring and unsustainable dividends'
this clip from today:
Yes – Algonquin’s juicy dividend. The drop in share price has caused Algonquin’s dividend to soar. As of the time of writing, the stock is down over 50% year to date, while the dividend yield has swelled to 10.93%.
That’s an insane, if not unsustainable, dividend yield. Even if Algonquin were to slash its dividend in half, it would still offer a very competitive yield, and still one of the better-paying options on the market.
the dividend $ has NOT changed; only the yield as a % of share price has
either the company can support the dividend or it cannot
my point: a dividend is a reflection of the strength of the balance sheet and the companies cashflow
that the price gets knocked in half is irrelevant to the dividend paid
UNLESS said bal/sht and cashflow will no longer support the divy at that amount
(yes, i understand that the current price reflects people's belief that the balance sheet cannot continue this level of dividend)
so, are these type clips just sensationalizing or am i completely wrong?
again.........
thx
happy new year team
what am i missing here?
time and again, when a dividend company comes under pressure (in this case AQN) all the wags talk about 'soaring and unsustainable dividends'
this clip from today:
Yes – Algonquin’s juicy dividend. The drop in share price has caused Algonquin’s dividend to soar. As of the time of writing, the stock is down over 50% year to date, while the dividend yield has swelled to 10.93%.
That’s an insane, if not unsustainable, dividend yield. Even if Algonquin were to slash its dividend in half, it would still offer a very competitive yield, and still one of the better-paying options on the market.
the dividend $ has NOT changed; only the yield as a % of share price has
either the company can support the dividend or it cannot
my point: a dividend is a reflection of the strength of the balance sheet and the companies cashflow
that the price gets knocked in half is irrelevant to the dividend paid
UNLESS said bal/sht and cashflow will no longer support the divy at that amount
(yes, i understand that the current price reflects people's belief that the balance sheet cannot continue this level of dividend)
so, are these type clips just sensationalizing or am i completely wrong?
again.........
thx
happy new year team