Q: I think my question was more related to, do you agree that GLCC was so much better than AEM.
Using 04/21/2011 as start date to match available data range for AEM.CA and GLCC.CA
AEM.CA GLCC.CA Growth of $10,000.00
With Dividends Reinvested
Click for detailed chart tool
Start date: 04/21/2011 04/21/2011
End date: 01/17/2025 01/17/2025
Start price/share: $64.99 $10.04
End price/share: $123.09 $28.11
Starting shares: 153.87 996.02
Ending shares: 194.26 3,596.08
Dividends reinvested/share: $14.08 $21.84
Total return: 139.12% 910.86%
Average Annual Total Return: 6.54% 18.32%
Starting investment: $10,000.00 $10,000.00
Ending investment: $23,899.77 $101,111.35
Years: 13.75 13.75
Using 04/21/2011 as start date to match available data range for AEM.CA and GLCC.CA
AEM.CA GLCC.CA Growth of $10,000.00
With Dividends Reinvested
Click for detailed chart tool
Start date: 04/21/2011 04/21/2011
End date: 01/17/2025 01/17/2025
Start price/share: $64.99 $10.04
End price/share: $123.09 $28.11
Starting shares: 153.87 996.02
Ending shares: 194.26 3,596.08
Dividends reinvested/share: $14.08 $21.84
Total return: 139.12% 910.86%
Average Annual Total Return: 6.54% 18.32%
Starting investment: $10,000.00 $10,000.00
Ending investment: $23,899.77 $101,111.35
Years: 13.75 13.75
5i Research Answer:
According to Bloomberg, GLCC was $99.90 on April 14, 2011, the first trading date we have. Stock return since then is -71.30%, not including distributions. AEM's return, same terms and timeframe, is -271.34%. GLCC has a much higher dividend, but much of it is return of capital, so NAV decays. We do not think the other program is taking into account GLCC's reverse splits. It had a 1 for 2 reverse split in 2013 and a 1 for 5 reverse split in 2016.