Original answer about growth:
IFC (property and casualty insurance and auto insurance) - consensus growth estimate over the next few years 6%
TSU (specialty insurance) - consensus growth estimate over the next few years 10%-12%
TSU has the best growth, as the company reinvested the majority of its earnings back, and volume growth in TSU’s recent quarters is quite healthy. TSU has the strongest growth, but we think IFC could be the most balanced name between capital returns and growth.
IFC, at $46B in market cap, is 23X as large as TSU. Small companies have an inherently better ability to grow, since they have far more leverage to single contracts, acquisitions or other corporate activity. Our comments related to the size of IFC and its more stable operations due to better business diversity. It also pays a dividend and TSU does not, so that can make shares more stable as well. TSU has the ability to grow faster and consensus estimates calls for faster growth in the next two years. But this does not always translate into better stock performance, but it certainly can. But IFC is the far more conservative and reliable stock of the two.