skip to content
  1. Home
  2. >
  3. Questions
  4. >
  5. ZMMK: Recently sold a rental house and am looking for investment in low risk but monthly payment in a non registered account. [BMO Money Market Fund]
You can view 2 more answers this month. Sign up for a free trial for unlimited access.

Investment Q&A

Not investment advice or solicitation to buy/sell securities. Do your own due diligence and/or consult an advisor.

Q: Recently sold a rental house and am looking for investment in low risk but monthly payment in a non registered account. I’m not comfortable with bonds and so far have come up with either laddered GICs ( paid out every 6 months) or combination of PFL, XFR, and ZMMK. Do you have any thoughts on any of this. Which would have a the best tax rate implications? And would you have any other suggestions that would work best in the current reduced rate environment we are heading in the next few years.
Thanks
Asked by Craig on April 16, 2024
5i Research Answer:

PFL has a high yield (12.2%) but high variability. 5-year annualized return is only 3.05%. It lost 17.9% in 2022 and for a conservative investor we doubt it would be a good choice. It uses leverage (26%) which is another risk factor. XFR invests in floating rate bonds. 5 year is 2.18%. Certainly a conservative choice but GICs of course offer much higher yields, and yields on this ETF could decline with rates. ZMMK is a money market ETF and certainly conservative. Indicated yield is 5.16%. It does not have a long history but we would consider it very safe. Yields will decline with rates as well. Overall, if one is looking for ultimate safety and high yield, with no equity exposure, the GIC ladder looks best to us. All would have similar tax implications. HSAV may be of interest, as it is a cash maximizer ETF that does not pay distributions, which can be more tax effective for some. 3-year return 3.40%. It has been in existence for less than 5 years so no comparable return there.